>>28033953>I don't understand contextIt seems like a stretch, but obviously it doesn't mean "The Final Game".
It most likely pertains to the last of the game's 20 year long formula.
Which is off only due to a big Company making billions off of a product wouldn't likely "Fix what's not broken" risking revenue.
It means future games will change to be more in-depth or change aesthetically.
It may get more "edgy", or simply stop solely pandering to young children, the story will get better writing, the game play will be more engaging. Maybe even some redesigns or art directions to go in more developed progression.
>This means in future games we may freely walk around in forest and deserts with friends in servers hunting down pokemon we actually see in the overworld instead of random generated patches and battle/trade random people we pass. More of a sandbox role and play style to greater the adventure.It doesn't mean erasing all of the pokemon, world or anything it just means a new direction.
But knowing GF, they wouldn't do anything bold or cool.
