/vp/ - Pokémon » Searching for posts with the image hash ‘dRbFbZu4TwDyYcPY758inw==’.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1383067637493.jpg, 14KiB, 295x295

Anonymous Sun 24 Nov 2013 16:37:06 No.16217843 View View Report

Quoted By:

>tfw in 1 week everyone including all the kids will be swimming in 6IV Dittos, shinies, legendaries and so on

I enjoyed the situation while it lasted. Even though it'd cost me many pokemon including self-gotten legit movie Arceus and more I almost wish GF had made a clean cut and not allowed transfers at all

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1383067637493.jpg, 14KiB, 295x295

Anonymous Fri 08 Nov 2013 20:54:54 No.15731579 View View Report

Quoted By:

>>15722832
Actually I am pretty sure that unlike FS it doesn't assign you two pokemon based on your FC, it just gives the same two pokes to the same slots on all carts.

Example: The dude you have as a friend in the sixth slot will have the same two pokemon as the guy I have registered in my sixth slot, if you get what I mean.

It just assigns your friends to the predetermines pokemon pairs.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1383067637493.jpg, 14KiB, 295x295

Anonymous Tue 05 Nov 2013 20:58:22 No.15629891 View View Report

Quoted By:

Might as well use this thread.

I'm a bit confused about Destiny Knot.
I have two scenarios in my head on how it works.

1) The baby pokemon looks at it six stats. Now it takes 5 out of those (for example all but HP). Then it's random whether it inherits this stat from the father or the mother.

2) The mechanic is so that destiny knot lets the pokemon double-dip, meaning it could for example select:
Father HP
Mother HP
Father DEF
Mother SPATK
Mother SPEED

Now since it selected two HP ones it only picks one of those at random, meaning one of the destiny knot picks was "wasted".

I'm not sure whether anyone understands what I'm trying to get at (my English isn't good enough to describe it probably), but hopefully someone can explain it all to me

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1383067637493.jpg, 14KiB, 295x295

Anonymous Fri 01 Nov 2013 23:27:00 No.15478421 View View Report

Quoted By:

ICE
NEEDS
MORE
RESISTANCES

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1383067637493.jpg, 14KiB, 295x295

Anonymous Wed 30 Oct 2013 19:52:55 No.15398250 View View Report

Quoted By:

>>15398176
>Battling is.

Simulator. Nothing but battling. Man you oughta love it!

Oh.. wait, there are actually good people fighting on simulators and you just want to beat up random wifi BR kids who spam blaziken and yveltal all day.
Damn :(

>>15398221
What's the point? You could have just genned the legendaries.

The only reason you could have done it for is because you get a laugh out of tricking people, which is just further proof of hackers being childish as fuck

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1383067637493.jpg, 14KiB, 295x295

Anonymous Tue 29 Oct 2013 20:57:29 No.15360483 View View Report

Quoted By:

Reminder that pokeradar chaining is vastly more difficult in XY than it was in DPPt and that not only is it annoying to differentiate between the one billion ways patches can shake in, chains also break at complete random sometimes.

MMers will never know the despair and frustration that is chaining

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Searching for posts with the image hash ‘dRbFbZu4TwDyYcPY758inw==’. 6 results found.

On these archives

Your latest searches