>>34397570Gives me the impression you've been here since Gen I and are content with "normie" favourites. Good for you.
>>34397601Distribution of types is triggering my autism, but I do like the choices individually.
>>34397851Not into using older gen mons in a "new gen" game, but at least your choices are on point. I give it an "ehh".
>>34397888Props for getting my bro Kingdra on board, but the lack of committing to a full mono-type team bothers me. Remix with more water types and we'll talk.
>>34397889Dual starters gets under my skin, but otherwise it's rather diverse for a "girly" mon team which I'm 100% on board with.
>>34397897Weird type overlaps. If I saw you on the opposing side of an online battle, I'd definitely disconnect. But seems like you enjoy OU so more power to ya.
>>34397905I can get behind all of them except Stunfisk. Good range for shitmons. Solid team.
>>34397933Excellent selection of secondary typings. And the superior choice of mega of the two options. Totally approved.
>>34398123Seems a bit confused / chaotic, but clearly built of your favourites, so you do you. Bonus points for including one of the best bugs.
>>34398191Your typo / lack of text planning bothers me. But Braviary redeems it all. Shame about no mega though. Overall, I'm blah about it.
>>34398231Agreed on Mega Zangoose and the inevitable Mega Seviper. Maybe in gen 12 or something. Really into the variety you have there. Especially the balance of phys / spec. Good work!
>>34398373I hate Mega Mence and Talonflame, but the other choices are A+, so I guess it averages out. Not too bad.
>>34398398This is a masterclass in interesting team building. Keep the faves, balance the types, and explore different gens. One of the best here.
>>34398473Of all the shinies to pick, why that monstrosity? But otherwise a fun looking bunch. It's a B from me.
>>34398599Team look-at-all-the-megas-i-don't-have? Good for a troll I suppose. Houndoom is present, so any other flaws are forgiven.
