>>51816045>Retard, read a goddamn book. Alright.
>What you're trying to argue is that gender as a concept should be disregarded and we should only accept biological sex as objective truth.Yes faggot, that's the point. When you refer to "gender", you're actually merely being pedantic over language, language that is referencing nothing that can be falsified in any material sense. Gender does not exist in the same way trannies do not exist; it's all autistic anglo word games to form a pseudo-reality against the one we live in.
>You're a sexual objectivist rather than a sexual relativist.Who gives a fuck.
>but the one thing they are correct about is that gender is a social construct.Doesn't make any sense. Social constructs that exist BECAUSE of important biological distinctions? No shit. Good luck proving they are independent of one another (you can't because you're a sophist faggot just like every single tranny apologist out there).