>>34611682I know that. But the point is that it's implemented on the design poorly. It's like they designed the entire thing, and then at the last second went "oh yeah shit this is supposed to be based on fireworks" and then just threw a sparkler on its tail with no regard with how it looks with the rest of the design. This is a much better example of a firework themed dragon done right.
>>34611954And guess what Porygon has? Pupils. Pokemon are living organisms first and foremost regardless of whether or not it's supposed to be artificial.
>>34611994>What are the rules for Pokemon eyes anyway?Not green with tiny white dots in them that's for fucking sure. Look through all of them and you start noticing patterns.
>isn't it better to create something newOnly if it's done well. Otherwise it doesn't look like a Pokemon and it makes for a bad fakemon. Golisopod has a reason for its eyes in that it's based on the actual animal it's based on. The shitshroom just has ugly non-Pokemon like eyes to have ugly non-Pokemon like eyes.
>Perhaps its meant to be soullessIt shouldn't be. That's not what Pokemon are.
>A lot more people prefer it that wayYou mean sage's circlejerk prefers it that way? No fucking shit.
