>>55723420the question was
why do they arrange trees [side by side] when it is literally possible to arrange them in a more visually aesthetic way like [offset like brickwork]
my answer was
>that would look weirdi further explained that the gaps caused by making the trees offset would be more prominent in the vertical arrangement
the arguments against me are
>You are low IQ. Move all the trees on the left in the red circle down one or two spaces>arranging them the way they are in the yellow circle (offset, horizontally) makes them look better>you are brown>you dont get it (doesnt explain what i should be getting)>you are eslthe suggestions made are dumb, but i could be proven wrong if anon just mocked up a quick demonstration and it didnt look stupid
anon was really dumb when he suggested the top left picrel, because that would mean the tree line is uneven which would look dumb, but the top right image is the better solution but the other anon points out that
>the only problem with the top-right arrangement is having 2 tiles of space between the pair of two trees, which isn't really a big dealif other people dont think its a big deal then fine, but the gaps break the illusion of a thicket of trees which looks dumb AND IMPORTANTLY
is my explanation for why the devs made that decision, which was what the original question asker asked
