>>56166952>Meanwhile, you’re trying to force your way into animal. Ayooo.And here we go again with your favorite topic, you literally could not refrain from it even for 1 post.
Btw, stop derailing conversation and ignoring everything you couldn't answer, so I'll repeat it again.
"I can also say that this is a fox's muzzle, with a quite easily readable emotional and semantic message, sent in response to the provocative first post."
>You’re making it obvious that this got under your skin.It is obvious that it got under your skin, it wasn't me who created entire thread and then spend entire weekend replying to everyone. But I'm not gonna lie, so there it is: I like to argue and enjoy dominating myopponent and you make a great target.
> I genuinely don’t understand why you can’t accept that attraction to animalistic behavior and anatomy isn’t zoophilic in anyway. Hell, I’ll even throw you a bone by saying that traditional furry shit seems very tame compared to pokephilia, since fursonas are essentially just humans with fur and animal heads (similar to cynocephaly). All this pokephilia shit teeters too hard on the master-pet relations, but guys like you still argue otherwise for no reason other than sheer denial. It’s much less shameful to accept and admit it than to keep doing whatever you’re doing, man.A great deal of yapping, strawmanning and projecting, sadly it is based on a false equivalency. Again pokephilia is similiar to zoophilia in a same way as normal sexuality is similiar to necrophilia. And sadly for you, I guess, pokemons would never be mere animals.
Reminder: stop ignoring 95% of my posts, it shows that you argue in a bad faith.
