>>40424215>Prove all of those logically.Really? Okay.
>1+1=2 but also 1+1=5 therefore 1+1=FishThis is an example of a non-sequitar, it stars with a logical premise bit follow it through to its conclusion. This is what is generally meant by a non-sequitar. It has its own logical premise behind it called CONSISTENCY. An inconsistent argument will give you an inconsistent result ie Garbage in you’ll get garbage out. Isn’t that logical? Its enough for the scientific method, if not for then congrats on living in your own private Matrix. Consistency is thought of as an axiom in logic, its why the concept of non-sequitars are a thing