>>42739237>food analogyYour problem dexcuck?
>implying no one would be happy to be able to play with these newer pokemonMost people hate the Sinnoh cross evolutions. EVERYONE looks down on Rhyperior after what it did to the Rhyhorn line.
>Imagine trying this hard to spin new content as a bad thing. Not all things are good just because you put them in a game
>I guess you would've preferred it if these remakes cut pokemon out like in your swsh, huh?I wouldn't care how many are in. The main issue is WHICH mons are in. Are you getting this through your thick skull yet?
>Yes. You wouldn't know the feelingOkay. Go shop only at the dollar store then.
>>42739316>adding new pokemon doesn't justify charging $60>but removing pokemon justifies charging $90 plus $15 a yearYes because one is just a remake while the other is a new game with 80+ new pokemon and more new and positive content to it.
Stop trying to shove your ugly designs at everyone. Tangrowth will never be as cool as Tangela
