>>54601780>which onesOkay
>pokemon should have never went full open worldIt was the next logical step, and the formula works. However, GF is a shitty Developer and performance issues bog it down.
>pokemon should keep the same names as in Japan, as is a japanese game, localized names are censorship of japanese artistsPart of the marketability is because of the translated puns.
>the series decadence started at muttnovaWrong, I peaked at Gen 5. It was the last time GF put any effort into a game.
>PLA, SWSH and BDSP were the last good pokemon gameSwSh was trash and set the precedent for dexit, and BDSP is the laziest game to date. PLA was pure SOVL though
>mints are pointless, those don't change nature, only stats, Japan already debunked it and laughs at itAlready discussed this retarded opinion.
>competitive players are too spoiled. Nowadays you can change your pokemon IVs and favoured stats on a brink, there's no excuse to cheat in a children gameMaking competitive mode accessible is not a bad thing. It increases the player base. How's that bad?
>schools shouldn't be a main setting for a pokemon game, as those break any immersion and escapism, because schools are depressive places that ruin people livesSchools have been a part of the series since literally gen 1.
I actually do agree with the rest of your points though. Also
>zoomerI'm 39 and have been playing Pokemon since Blue back in '98.
