>>53454128Not a single one of those looks as malformed as Inteleon does, and again, those atleast have good shots and good depictions in other media to show the design is succesful. You seem to have a problem understanding that. Inteleon isn't just below average, it's straight up at the bottom. A derpy charizard passes, while Inteleon's best drawings still look like a disaster, along with it's 3d models and more being hideous too.
