>>37079869>Partly because there are a bunch of mons who I can appreciate conceptually, but their designs are slop.And where's the limit? There are some designs that are weird or "slop" because their concepts need a design like their ones.
Sometimes these threads give me the feeling you guys unironically think the only thing that mattered was one guy that drew a random sketch and put it an arbitrary name and typing while the truth is these designs were accepted with a complete art design team that knew that every accepted Pokémon will be permanent with their flaws for some reason (maybe not flawed for them and actually the only flaw is the games never inquired in these details that people find "flawed")
