>>12125361What?
>>12131285Uh, no. I have bred for good ones. It's a fucking waste of time and I make a habit of just using Pokegen now. I use up less time and it's more fun.
And again, realism != good. IVs are the shittiest way I've ever seen of making stuff in a game unique. Natures are how you implement decemt individuality. Easy to control if you know what you're doing and evenly distributed no matter what nature a Pokemon has. IVs make certain Pokemon objectively worse. The people who actually support this shit are the ones being dumb.
>>12131388>IV's reward those who got lucky with rolling diceFixed that for you. IVs have nothing to do with skill or effort. I could breed 200 Pokemon and get none with satisfying IVs while some schmuck out there can get good IVs on the first or second try.
>>12132024I'm sorry I don't like tediously breeding boxes full of Pokemon just to get a good result. God forbid I actually like to have fun in my video games while still raising competitively excellent Pokemon.
