>>33709684If you are going to say "this is how your logic is" without actually explaining it, then go on to explaining yourself in an almost identical kind of logic, at least have some decency and submit your own faults. If only you dropped your stance that it was the outcome, the end result, that would define the realization of a model, then maybe there would have been a greater discussion in this thread. If (You) only could listen, right.
