>>55661930>That still has thought put into its world buildingYeah and the worldbuilding is still intact you drooling YouTuber-cuck. Design-wise, they make all the sense in the world for a group of pokemon from the past and future in a game that's for kids.
>the pokemon blatantly make no sense again, the only thing that isn't explained is how exactly heath saw them, which was already delved into here
>>55661745>they're called on and not the otherthey're called both because they seemed contradictory before the game revealed them being from the past and future. That's what they're called as well; in-game and across all the medias of the franchise. As a group, they're called paradox pokemon, but that group is divided between ancient and future pokemon. Sorry you hear words only selectively