>>26878384The demand for a new and fresh edition of my original critical discourse has not induced me to make any alterations towards my original posts. By this I do not mean to imply that the discourse has not been attacked and criticized, for a greater majority of the thread than I am proud to speak of has done so, many in the most vulgar and crude methods, but rather that it does not appear to me to have been answered properly or refuted unanimously, or on a deep and profound level of thought, meditation, philosophy, and connection to the real world, its society, its people, and their unique and common elements and characteristic of their natures. Rightly or wrongly I felt convinced that a good many of the criticisms came from people who have mistaken my aim, while not a few emanated from readers who were bitter and ardent opponents from the beginning.
Of these antagonists to my perspective, let it be said without too great a disdain or resentment towards those in question that, in dealing with a subject regarding which feelings easily run high to the people on this board in particular, they were perhaps a little too prone to read anti-Pokemon, progenwunner or unovabortionistic views into a context that was only anti-Greninja, and to suppose that I was necessarily and wholly hostile to any specific generation or game, because I inveighed against certain current tendencies which I still believe are falsely assumed to express the fullest potential of the artistry and design of Pokémon, its idiosyncrasy with the gameplay, and its impact on children and adults alike.
