>>24871701>when new ones do it's superfluous, "overdesigned and edgy"Uh, no. Because it's not detail. It's just random shit slapped on.
>Yeah, it's cherry pickingExcept it's not. You've got to be dense as fuck to not see the different in design philosophy between now and then.
>Which isn't very much at all...Still more realistic than newgen Pokemon.
>Hint: They don't have lightning bolt tails and animu eyes.Oldchu still matches better than newchu.
>Pikachu has always had a bobble head designNo it didn't. LOOK at the fucking picture. Its head is practically the same part as the rest of its body.
>They both look the sameUh, not hey don't. You're not even making an actual argument, you're just covering your eyes, plugging your eyes and yelling "NUH UH" to every comparison, even the most blatant ones. The image already points out the differences and why Keldeo is more cartoony so I won't go over it again.
>Literally, pidgey has less feather designAre we looking at the same picture?
>>24871739>Cherry pickingI'm starting to think you newgenners don't know what cherrypicking is. Comparing nearly 30 Pokemon and finding a consistent pattern isn't cherrypicking.
Doing what
>>24871422 did is cherrypicking. Yet strangely enough none of you are are calling it out. I wonder why that is.
>Also Fletchling is about as close to the real thing as a pokemon can getI haven't seen any birds with completely oversimplified clean curved wings, do you?
>>24871783I do. None of the ones I've seen have a super thin waist like Liepard does.
>>24871809nah m8
