>>28893859>I think we also have way too many NSFW boards. I feel like they could be combined down some.This. For example, I find /d/ and /aco/ redundant.
/b/ is better to leave as the underage bait it is, so they don't spread their bullshit to another sites.
Better keep /pol/ as it is. Those guys are capable of dragging 4chan with them if they're deleted.
Even if it would make sense to be merged with /b/, [s4s] and /r9k/ have much of a board culture to be deleted; in the same way as us, /vr/ and /vg/ with /v/.
Hobby boards without a definite culture (like /o/, /p/, /3/, /an/, /biz/, /cgl/, /ck/, /diy/, /fa/, /gd/, /his/, /n/, /out/, /po/, /toy/ and /trv/) can switch to a forum and almost nobody will complain. They can also go to Wheelie Chan if they want to keep being anonymous.
/soc/ defeats the purpose of Anonymous and therefore must be deleted.
I don't know what /mlp/ discusses about, besides "I want to fuck X pony", thing they can do in /trash/. Besides MLP fad is long gone now.
I don't know how are /hr/ and /wg/ different. As are /jp/ and /a/, /i/ and /ic/, /lgbt/ and /y/, and /e/, /h/ and /u/.
The rest, like /k/ and /tg/ are good as they are.
>>28893921/vp/'s autism is something strangely comfortable. In /v/ we would be as Gardevoir threads are here; so we would finally get relocated in /trash/ in the eventual case it happens; as Steven Universe generals were relocated there from /co/.
Or Wheelie's /poke/ but that board is abandoned; and many would complain that it's like a red /vp/.
>>28894053>Does /v/ need to be burdened with 4 different Pokemon game threads? I guarantee you that they would be at least 15 Pokemon threads at a given time in /v/ if /vp/ gets deleted.