>>39609276>You gave your life away, no ifs, ands, or buts about itNo. I agreed to make myself at his disposal as his pokemon so long as he holds up his end of the bargain, Its indentured servitude something the anime shows quite well.
>If they don't, it doesn't matter how it it is written or who approved it, it is not actually possession.Then you don't understand possession. If you lease a car and get into an accident is it considered your car for the sake of enforcing the law or the one who issued the lease?
Basically I'd be on loan like squirtle, for the purpose of his journey though I'd be considered his property with all legal protection therein. Why? Because caught me meaning I'd be registered. I"d be considered owned.
>Actions speak louder than words. If you're going to turn it around and make them do all the work for you, you are no better.How are they doing all the work? I'm doing all the pokemon fighting on that journey, hes feeding me, healing my wounds, keeping me company, ect ALL SO I'LL FIGHT. Without me and without the pokemon he has no purpose, me on my own could still have one however I would have chose to follow a human for conveince.
>All you have to do is not leave and you get everything you want.No retard, I would be part of the trainers raison d'être, he'd have a reason to want meet his demands, and I'd have meet every one of his as his pokemon ie property.
>That is not an equitable agreement.Indeed as yours isn't argument, its a misconception of what ownership is. You seem to believe free will is impossible as a possession, that indebtedness isn't a thing and if it you can have ZERO rights under it. That is bullshit. You don't understand the concept of possession.
