>>46923932>I feel there is when you make a claim that every sequel has less contentEvery sequel does have cut content. There is no strawman.
>some bits of older games had more interesting designs when going through themYou mean like Sword and Shield?
>example please?> it would still be helpful to player for at minimum one gymSS gives the player Fly pretty much immediately. This is pointless.
>2. The Wild Area isn't a routeSo? It's still a part of the game. If it was called "Route 11" would you suddenly suck its dick more?
>3. You put the Rotom Rally (which is a storyless sidequest/grinding bit)Just like diving in BW. Congrats, you understood the point of my analogy.
>This feels like a weak way to compare bits while also relying ENTIRELY on the wild areaHow is it weak to compare something that's in the game when we're discussing the game?
