>>42102145>You don't need 800+ Pokemon for a complete gameYou could literally justify cutting everything in half with that excuse. Who needs more than two cities? Who needs a story that takes longer than an hour to complete? None of that is required for a complete game, either. Perhaps they'll implement those reductions in gen 9.
>Are you admiting that it's not the content that is lowering, but rather that your demand is increasing?>actually blaming other people for expecting a game to be better than the one before itImagine being this much of a drone
