>>55885675I've always felt like the way in which people on /vp/ call random shit "flops" is probably one of, if not the greatest signs that this board has a gaggle of abnormal sperglords who genuinely do not consume any media besides Pokemon - meaning they don't have an actual frame of relativity as to what is or isn't a "flop" - but are just vaguely imitating something that they've seen someone else here say, so they'll call basically anything that sold any arbitrarily lower amount of units more than another game in this franchise a flop even if that same game mogged the shit out of some AAA title in another franchise that's jacking itself off for selling sub-10 million copies or something similar.
