>>38061304>is that someone disagreeing with me?>he must be from REDDITwhat exactly are you arguing for anyway? Do you think that Pokémon games are objectively good in ANY way? I'm just arguing that the only half-decent ones are the ones that can stand as their own games.
>>380613287.5 at most. I'm used to skewed reviews so I'd probably bump them down to 6.5 and 6.0 to be more accurate.
