https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcVgpbBlZSAshenanigans: the team
bug/dark duo type because i was told by a friend that those two types suit me the most, only 4 mons because i prefer smaller teams that are more focused in trying to convey a certain personality. not too happy with the team composition honestly, and i couldn't find a better trainer card background, but it'll do
>>392571857/10, this team should be fine but something about it rubs me the wrong way - maybe it's the not-quite-perfect colour co-ordination? music is a pretty good choice for this team though
>>392572809.5/10, the only reason i wouldn't rate it 10/10 is because i think toxicroak doesn't quite fit the team perfectly (although it fits it well enough to be functional). team would probably be written off as mindless and edgy if it wasn't for the music, i don't think you could've chose a better track
>>392576645/10, team is functional but feels extremely forgettable as it doesn't really have a character beyond "strong and catagorically distributed types". music helps save this team a bit, but i'm not convinced it's a fitting choice either
>>392577736/10, feels odd that this team has 6 mons, i feel like the team would prefer a smaller selection of mons to convey a more personal theme, especially as the team would seem a bit generic without the context of the trainer sprite or music
>>392578093/10, once again there's very little personality here at all beyond "cool", and the music doesn't help inject any either
>>392579955/10, would easily be a 8/10 if you didn't choose such an unfitting track
>>39259462nngggggggghhhhhhhh
>>392595648/10, i feel like i should be rating this lower as i'm not convinced that the music is actually fitting for the team and i can't draw too much from the team, but at the same time it all feels very personable and genuine, without the minun or masquerain i reckon i wouldn't get this impression
>>392596858/10 hot theming and an unusual but good choice of music