>>46274363>Real circumstantial evidence Yes, because we've grown and shrunk so many things.
>No point in repeating myselfYou keep doing it anyways as if it changes anything.
>Satisfactory is exactly as I define it as because I said soGood job, retard.
You can't pretend that Dynamax is any more feasible than the reverse. Not to mention, minimize literally exists in the Pokemon world, pointing to the fact that shrinking does indeed work.
On top of that, Pokemon forms are already shrunken and contained in Pokeballs.
You keep trying to apply real world theory, but despite that we've fully seen not only shrinking but a myriad of other science fiction in Pokemon.
If you're going to use what you call "logic," at least base it in the realm of the world we're talking about, which is the Pokemon World.
