>>25295239>Sprites like B/W2 but with Gen 6 style animations.So... The worst of both worlds?
>Around 150 new mons.Way too much. It'll be gen V all over again with maybe less than a dozen cool new mons and 100+ shitmons. They need to pace themselves and concentrate on quality>quantity. Anywhere between 50-100 new mons per gen is a good number, but I'm leery of anything more based on past experience.
>Give evolutions to old mons that need them.Completely agree with this, but they've shot themselves in the foot here by giving megas to some pokemon that needed evos first. I guess it can be solved if they retcon megas, something most players would be happy with.
>New type.The problem here is they're running out of possible types. I've heard "music" type and "alien" type thrown about, and the others being proposed are getting even more ridiculous. Unless people have a specific type they want introduced, crusading for vague "new types" is worse than useless.
>Harder difficultyThis. Gen 6 was a big step back from gen V in this regard, but Masuda seems committed to increasing casualization of an already easy series.
>Less event only monsI've gotta disagree with you here. Better event coverage for NA and Europe? Sure. But there are certain pokemon that have gained a reputation for being "mythical" in rarity, and I hope they stay that way. Deoxys has already fallen from this list. Who will be next?
>Give mons that are nearly impossible to get without hacking or events a way to be caught normally. Like Jirachi, Mew, Shaymin, Darkrai, ETC.See above. NO. These pokemon were created for the sole purpose of being extremely rare. It's not as though they're legal in competitive play or required to complete the national dex. You really have no case here.
>A rival like Gary or Silver, In other words a complete douche.This I agree with. Either give us another edgelord, or somebody ambiguous who we're not sure whether or not to route for, like N.
