>>56167943Oh, I never paid much attention to the dude since there was that app to check affection.
Copers will probably say that he's making shit up.
I don't like this line myself
>Humans can't understand the cries of Pokémon, nor our feelings. However, there are some among us that understand human speech... Hehehe, <player>, you're not bad for a human.But it can be attributed to low friendship level, since higher level responses give:
><nickname> and <player> make a perfectly matched combo! I've seen all sorts of people so far... But <player> understands <nickname>'s feelings most! I'm a little hungry... You can tell, right?><nickname> and <player> make a friendly combo. <player>'s feelings, <nickname> can understand. <nickname>'s feelings, <player> understands!Either way nothing in there even remotely implies that Pokémon are animals. Thanks anon, I've learned something new.
