>>52864793>Turo doesn't even consider them artificial in the first place, he wants to reintroduce them to nature, he likely believes Pokemon of the future just Look Like That.You're completely missing the point.
If he was inspired by the book and to a lesser extent Occulture he would have absolutely no reason to believe they were from the future until AFTER the time machine was built and he confirmed it was a futuristic pokemon he brought through.
>I understand it fine You didn't even understand the term "sleek" and you expect me to believe that?
>to prove the point that the professor has always been extremely dedicated to their goal Which it doesn't prove because the majority of the logs were written after they had the idea.
Although you could say that the first two not mentioning it shows that they weren't as obsessed as you think and changed in the crater.
>on top of in game dialog from the AI.The irony being that the AI was based on the mind of the professor and still couldn't fathom their actions. It's as if something was influencing them.
>What is your basis for this?Common sense for starters.
>You understand the idea of science fiction has existed since before even the 1600s?Not exactly elements of it like beings from another planet happened every now and then but their beings were just humans but sci-fi as in unimaginable aliens, experiments gone wrong, the future, machine revolting etc was about early 1800s and by the time of war of the worlds machines still looked like this anyway
At the same time you can't compare real life media to pokemon media, given the Pokestar movies, specifically the time gate traveller one set in the future looks like a 60s style future rather than media set in the future we had in the modern day.
Cont.
