>>39607298>What's your point anon?The point you just made. You can't identify these pokemon by their traits, they amalgamated abominations that defy classification. Saying for instance Venusaur is a frog then defending it by its traits such as how it walks or its moves everybody fucking knows unrelated pokemon can learn is BULLSHIT.
Its not a frog, its not a toad, its not a dinosaur, its just a Venusaur which is an amalgamate of half dozen species of plant, animal, reptile and mammal but not amphibian as it has no amphibious traits at all like it has no avian traits.
>No pokemon is exactly like the animal they're based onIf Venusaur and the bulbasaur line is based off amphibians then the artists fucked up as neither bulbasaur, ivysaur or venusaur have a single amphibious trait. Its not that doesn't look exactly like it, its that it looks NOTHING like it.
