>>17954686>That's a half baked fan theory.>implying your theories aren't>These aren't animals and they don't fit in with biology as we know it.Except for the majority of cases when they do. Most of the more animalistic Pokemon are analogous for animals in most of the games and anime episodes. They have predators and prey, most are able to be domesticated, some are farmed (Floccesy Ranch) and eaten (Slowpoke Tails at the very least). Not all Pokemon are animals, but some species serve as animal equivalents. The ones that don't have any biological explanation are the exception, not the rule.
>The eggs aren't even eggs.Weren't you just blasting the guy for putting out a half baked fan theory? What else would they be if not eggs? They're labeled eggs, it's only reasonable to assume that they're fucking eggs.
>Wailord x Skitty.Part of the same egg group and technically capable of breeding, but I doubt actually do-able because of physical incompatibilities without AI or in-vitro or something. Day-care couple could have a hand in it.
>If anything the young are generated through means that are completely different from what we're used to.Could be, but could just as easily be anything else
>Even the Daycare people have no idea how it happens.Or maybe they just want to skirt around the awkwardness of the conversation. Or hell, maybe GF doesn't want to address it either way because it's the focus of the game and they've got a public image to maintain.
