>>33318629>Then maybe you should live by those words too? Why look to ban him instead of growing a thicker skin to his antics? This isn't a hugbox, so put up with him instead of asking for him to be whisked away.Because it's the same shit that the Gardevoir threads and Phox Friday threads partake in, the only difference is that they decided to stick to a weekly schedule when everyone gave them shit for making a thread every day.
Another issue is that his attitude is similar to the Dawnspammer's, have a good look...
>>33315854>"Not everyone comes here everyday. Maybe they don't feel like sharing or don't think they have any I don't. But they do, just in the last thread someone posted an image I didn't have, and in the one before that too.">Saying this when we have archives, both official and unofficial, that save images.>"How are you making it easier?">"Not everyone knows how/where to look.">Same as the above>cut back on making these threads to weekly at least>"Someday soon.">Saying this when the Gardevoir threads and Phox Phriday threads, threads far more cancerous than this for different reasons, moved to a weekly thread after people complained.>wah wah wah I need the board to be the way I like it and no way else>spams other threads that criticize the character for no good reason.>"Was one thread and not just me.">Shitposter's fallacy, can't be proven unless IP addresses are revealed. Also can't say that it won't happen again.After that some schmendrick told him to not respond to to shitposters, which is a double-edged sword.
>>33318666You don't speak for me, Satan.
>>33318710>I don't get how that complies with the need for it to not be a hugbox.If he actually stuck to the weekly model like these listed threads...
>Gardevoir/Ralts Line Saturdays>Eevee Fridays>Fox/Phox Fridays>Serena Sundays>Amourshipping Mondays (these are a good example of Krisfag's current threads)...then a LOT of the complaining would go away, but he won't.
