>>49516464I was a little strongly worded with that original post (which was from last thread... odd that you remembered it and had the urge to bring it up. Let it go, lmao). But even you acknowledge in your shitty greentext that both statements, the top and the "cope" underneath were both opinions given the fact that you included "personally I think."
Regardless of your shitty attempts to make an argument, I agree that I was a little bold with that claim.
Do you have any cards to post? Or just images from your favourite illustrator, /pol/?
