>>46282433mostly good-to-great taste but damn all those fire type starters suck. froslass and ribombee are inspired picks.
>>46282484damn you sure love your dragons! decent taste over all i guess.
>>46282589i fuck with your taste severely. castform is a waste of potential though
>>46282646the most interesting choices here are forretress and cradily, apart from that these all seem to be fairly unobjectionable if unexciting picks
>>46282785some really good picks like chandelure, malamar, sirfetch'd... and then you spoil it with excadrill and toxtricity
