>>42102684Timeless nugget of truth: posts that start with "Yuo stupid" are always 100% stupid. Vindicated time and time again.
>your reasoning for why the size comparison in OP is invalid based on a scaling issue is invalid because it's invalid!>"First of all...">proceeds to only list one thing besides reiterating their conclusion>their two different umbrellas just like you said they could be, so your point that they could be different umbrellas is wrong!As ever, it's not the inaccuracy of the stated points and cloudy-headed beliefs behind them that's foolish. It's the fool's confidence in stating them as if they're not only facts, not only an assemblage of them into a coherent point, not even only that they in any way relate to the discussion at all, but the notion that this makes the individual possessing them "smart" and anyone who disagrees "dumb". It's the arrogance that makes the post so stupid.
Perhaps by accident, there is something interesting buried in such a pointless post: the notion that one of either pieces of art is fanart. I wouldn't know or care if either pieces were fanart, but the entire discussion in this thread that I can witness has treated the two pieces as being evenly legit. If one piece is fanart, with evidence to show it, then the entire discussion about the specific comparison is moot in any case, and the assertion that the comparison is "accurate" right before "it could just be fanart" comes off as extra stupid.
