>>51347361>I am at a loss for words how you can accept one fictional mechanic while condemning another.Because one makes sense and the other doesn’t.
>but certainly is shown to be possible in several ways, in fact.You keep saying this yet the only examples we know of outside of electric Pokémon is literally Grotle and Mamoswine
>Because it is relevant to the discussionIt isn’t. A Pokémon making a shield out of natural forces =/= a Pokémon absorbing another attack. You’re reaching.
>gava us a concept that has been used several times since.Nothing like Thunder Armor has ever happened again since.
>bad writing has always been with how Ash even came up with that on the spot without any prior knowledgeNow replace Ash with Torracat and you just destroyed your own argument.
>Yes that's what I saidNo you didn’t, you said it was because it was based on prior experiences, which is delusional headcanon.
>What is consistency?It’s not consistent if it works completely different to the previous ways the concept was used, dummy.
>The onus on proving why it's bad is on youWhich I’ve done multiple times. On the contrary you haven’t been able to prove it’s good at all. It’s actually sad.
>writing is bad untill proven otherwiseStop being disingenuous retard. I explained why it’s bad, not just say it’s le bad. You haven’t been able to argue otherwise.
>HeadcanonReality, Torracat had no other way of winning.
>even you in a previous post said that he still could have won without itI was clearly talking about the battle as a whole, not specifically Torracat VS Incineroar. Reread the exact quote.
>adding your subjective value judgement without explaining the reasoning.Again, pot meet kettle. You even said in one post, and I quote: “Even if you think it's complete bullshit, eating your opponent's Blast Burn is some of the sickest shit in pokemon.”
Now fuck off
