>>56833685>Again, you're just proving my point.It would be proving your point if I said they were two different groups. Instead saying that they're the same group is doing the exact opposite.
>Every time someone from group 2 appears you act as if he was still from group 3, Correct, because group 2 acts exactly like group 3 applying the same arguments and "logic" and incessant shitposting as the imaginationfags from before.
>if people say "alternate timelines", you think they're saying "imagination", when they're actually saying "alternate timelines".No, no one is saying that anon. Granted your poor reading comprehension does explain a lot.
No one is saying that they aren't saying it's alternate timelines, what's being said is that they pivoted from imagination to alternate timelines to say that anything can happen much like the imagination theory, case in point
>>56833525>And the only reason 1 vs 2 is a thing at all is because 1 is too stubborn to accept multiple timelines despite them being the ones who claim to follow the exact text in the game. There's only one problem with your logic and it's pointed out every single thread that a time travel vs timelines argument crops up.
Alternate timelines still requires time travel. Group 1 was only ever debating that it was time travel so whether it is alternate timelines or a single one doesn't matter to them since it's all one thing to them so there's no reason for them to even argue at this point.
The only reason this argument comes up is the same reason it always does, people are staunchly opposed to the idea of paradoxes being from the past or future despite the game outright confirming it.
I'd also like to point out that in this conversation you're the only one trying to make enemies out of people, you feign neutrality but when met with the truth you label people as your opposing group.
I would suggest you stop posting now unless you truly want to show how ignorant you are of the goings on in lore threads
