>>45388377My problem with it is more the implication that older people can't enjoy kiddy things, or that poor quality can be excused by simply saying it's for kids. These are adults who are making these games
It was a franchise for everyone years ago, but Gen 7 onwards really has changed its attitude on that. It's a little tragic, honestly
>>45388413>/vp/ is one person>>45388471Same, I've been seeing anons saying that Pokemon is meant for kids lately
