>>18150319>Fuck all gets doneMaybe your argument would hold any credit if you hadn't been in the stream for an hour at most. I swear, you people seem to think that we didn't get all the way to Lavender without any anarchy at all.
And once again, all you seem to be able to argue is "muh progress." If you, again, had been in the stream way before it hit mass popularity, you would understand why people are having fun this way instead of your "slow Let's Play" mode.
Finally, you end up your argument with "They want the game to be played this way, therefore they were the bully in preschool who had fun at the expense of others." I couldn't, for the life of me, find a better example of ad hominem than this. Completely missing the point and just arguing like a crybaby about the people who want to keep a system of play like it is because it works.
For your sake and everyone else's, please stop trying to sound coherent.
