>>13521740 >It's by definition literally a stalagtite.
Whoa, whoa, let's back up for a second here.
According to you, It's not LITERALLY an ice cream cone since it's not ACTUALLY made of real ice cream, right? It just looks like one?
So, how can it LITERALLY be a stalagmite/stalactite when it's body also isn't ACTUALLY made of ice or the minerals that from real stalagmites?
It can't, according to your own line of thinking, and you're just contradicting yourself here. It just LOOKS like an icicle and/or stalagmite/stalactite, it isn't literally one, if you're going to make the argument that it's not an ice cream cone for the exact same reasons.
