>>29314571nice thread OP, had me thinking. I came to the conclusion that my definition of waifumon is: of humanoid "canonically attractive" female figure, or otherwise humanoid cute. So i think it's mostly a matter of blatantly designing a pokemon to have human female curves, or a human girl cuteness.
So:
Gen 1- None. Nidoqueen is just the female version of nidoking. I don't think the boobs were maliciously designed, i think it's just her hide.
Gen 2- Again, none. Bellossom is too cartoony to classify.
Gen 3- Kirlia, Gardevoir, Mawile. I don't think it was fully intentional, but Mawile does have heavy loli traits.
Gen 4- Lopunny. Froslass does have a sort-of seductress aura, but i don't think she classifies.
Gen 5- Lilligant, Meloetta. The Gothita line is debatable at best.
Gen 6- I think Braixen and Florges are the most blatantly made to be attractive (at least before gen 7). They're the first ones (except for Lopunny) to have clear female curves. Delphox is here only by extension.
Gen 7- Boy oh boy. Tseenee, Tsareena and Salandit's evo are borderline inexcusable. Magearna falls under the same line of Gothitelle. Poppmaid is a strange one: she's the first 100% animal pokemon to be designed in an attractive way.
So yeah, i think it's undeniable that GF is starting to get blatant in designing waifumons. Sun&Moon have made this more than clear.
Up to you to decide if this is a problem or not. I personally like pretty much each and every pokemon and i don't care that much if some have a sexualized design.
