>>29242296>What about Lilligant?Eh, she's cute, I can't find anything wrong with her design.
>>29242360>There's no way it's ''as bland'There is though, because it is bland.
Every gen has a theme in which it follows. Gen 5s was no different or more grand.
>it had unexpected twistsSuch as?
The game was incredibly transparent and I can't recall a single "twist" catching me off guard.
>It's baffling how you shit on gen 5 while forgiving all the stupid shit gen 6 did.Gen 6 had a good dex. Pokemon is first and foremost a monster raising game. The entire point of the games is lost of the dex is as dogshit as gen 5's.
And don't give me that difficulty crap, I breezed through both gen 5 games on my usual blind nuzlocke I do the first time I play any pokemon game.
The difficulty is piss easy in gen 5.
Sounds to me that if you were getting surprised by its baby tier story and struggling to beat it that it must have been your first pokemon game growing up or some shit.
>Right, I'd love to hear what are your favorite gen 6 and 7 mons then.Dragalge, Malamar, Clawitzer, Tyrantrum, Trevenant, Zygarde, Noivern to name a few, I could literally name almost all the dex for gen 6.
In gen 7, Wishiwashi (School form), Wimpods evo, Tsareena, Lurantis, the spider thing, all of the Ultrea Beasts, and Vikavolt to name a few.
>>29242411Eyes ruin it for me, the rest of the design is okay. Lack of other facial details is also a negative.
If the eyes were drew differently the design would be much better.
