>>13433526Like I said, it is much harder to work with since it is much more complicated then just having questions like "One tentacle or two?". Because then you have to go even further into that, and figure out where the tentacle should be and it would be about 20 different questions, actually maybe even more on where you would want everything placed and all the details.
>>13433627>>13433620The problem with that is having to rank 1-17 on what you like best. It isn't a good way of surveying them. And it has caused problems in the past doing it that way.
And so proposing the sub-grouping method because it would be much easier to survey and would probably be easier for people so they can visually see which one they want. Instead of trying to picture which on they want with the dozen of minor details. And here is a picture to show what I mean, You would first vote on the black categories. Ranking on which you like best. And then ranking the ones in the orange circles what you like best. And that way if that first group wins it would then already be narrowed down into the sub-grouped which can then be surveyed within those designs.
