>>24872381>You mean that one that has a bunch of random colors all over it? Woooooah so convincingJust proving my point that any designs you don't like you just throw out for "lol so random and edgy"
You're childish and can't even take a look in the mirror for what you say and then apply it to yourself.
>It's a fucking shadow. Shadows aren't exactly the epitome of detail retardYOU KEEP DOING IT!! "when genwun does simple its good and appealing but when newgen does its bad because why? I said so"
>If you honestly think newchu looks more like >>24871597 you're retardedBut you don't deny oldchu doesn't look like that other picture? Good job ignoring argument and shutting your ears then spewing retarded garbage.
Some mice look more like oldchu and other newchu. Also the angle of the photograph and the artist's style have a lot to do with it. Try denying this. Look even more retarded for us, please.
>A rainbow motif doesn't require a huge oversized head with cartoony proportions.Good point. But so what? Any motif at all doesn't require any specific design specification, either.
>Missing the point. We're talking about the subtle design traits of the Pokemon. Not the overall theme that it's going for. They made a bird with two heads because they wanted to fucking make a monster with two heads. But Dodrio still looks more like something that could be a realistic creature than most newgen Pokemon.Literally doublethink. You keep doing it m8. To you whenever genwun does something, it's great. when newgens do it, it's bad. No rhyme or reason either.
>pidgey is good being slightly realistic>taillow is bad being slightly realistic>doduo is good by being an unrealistic design>but fleltchling is bad because of its unrealistic shapeI see the pattern here, do you?
