>>50725399Do we even need to get through all the debunking on this? Shouldn't it be obvious from a glance that this is some amateur's work?
First off, the background is terrible. Like, it looks like they put a flat image behind it. I don't know how they made it look so flat otherwise.
Then you got the model itself full of really tacked on stuff like that chest piece that doesn't even look to be part of the model. Also those "hands" dont' look right at all. I don't even get how they expected those to animate, which looks like they didn't either since they don't even try in this idle.
Rigging is also clearly janked up looking at the cape on it's right side. You can see a specific angle as it "blows in the wind" that stays the same while it moves, as if the thing has one joint moving that whole point rather than a series like it would.
It is blurry and blown out, but even with that you can tell the texturing on it isn't nearly in line with the new texturing they're using for the game (i.e. how Sprigatito has a "fur" normal map on the parts of the body that are furry). They're using actual reflection and normals this time so they DON'T look like smooth playdoh like this thing does.
Finally, what is the situation where they think this took place? In what setup would they have this screen in a dark room where they could take this image somehow without anyone knowing? It's such a dumb way to "leak" something when you think about the actual scenario.
Peanutbuggy was way more believable, and it didn't try to hide shit by being overexposed and blurry.
