>>43256840Right, it's not like "dragon" is also an all-encompassing term for all those creatures. and of course these creatures can't be dragons because they have other names. so gamefreak should TOTALLY design all new types to account for the fact some dragons are also called "wyrms" or "drakes". putting them all under the dragon type is so unrealistic, right?
>IM the just the uneducated childyes, yes you are. as i said before, grow up