>>54794737Okay, forget the Schizo and Shartbaiters for a second. I do actually want to discuss this topic.
Personally, I think there's better and worse jobmons, and I think some jobmons are fine, while others are horrendous. There's factors to this:
>SpecificityThe more specific a job is, the worse. Jobs that are basically archetypes are less egregious (Samurott, Mismagius etc.) Super specific jobs liek the Galar starters are horrible.
>LogicI don't know how to title this, but jobs that are at least related to things animals already do are much better than ones that don't. So "jobs" that are just are just human ways of hurting each other (wrestler, boxer, grappler, swordman) make more sense for a pokemon to learn. Shit like a football player or a painter are stupid. Dancing and singing gets a pass because animals do that, but to a limit.
>DesignPokemon having human design elements is also retarded. Shit like hitmonchan's toga or Inteleon's suit-skin makes them look retarded. Just because a pokemon is inspired by a job doesn't mean it should "look" like that. Unironically greninja is a good design of a jobmon that's not just "job on a mammal+element".
I also think this applies to objectmons. There are good and bad ones, just that all the new ones are bad. Like always.
