>>53233931And your rebuttal to Anon was
>its good because I say soYou didn't even say anything GOOD about XY, you just said it wasn't the bad things anon said it was with a series of non sequiturs. There was zero defense, bro. This is Argument 101 shit, how did you pass English class with such a flimsy counterargument, assuming you had a formal education in the first place?