>>53351146Anon holy shit what in god's name are you talking about? I've applied so much motion blur here that Great Tusk would need to be falling out of an airplane and it STILL doesn't look like the long, thin horns you see in the photograph.
I'm trying to tell you, it doesn't matter if the photo is old, if the subject is moving at 300mph on a bumpy hill, short, fat spikes do not become long and thin. Even at this level of blur, to the point where I can barely see the fucking thing, the spikes are still very clearly fat triangle shapes.
>>53351187But the photo isn't even recognizable as tusk anymore, if I need to turn Tusk into a fucking skidmark to match the shape, doesn't that mean the shapes don't match? The actual photo we're talking about here isn't even 1/100th as blurry as we're at right now.
