>>45215453>Completely subjective,Everyone using Salamence and Metagross and Kangaskhan is subjective? Huh?
>What if I care more about singles, though?Hey, would you look at that? Charizard is even BETTER in singles! Amazing what things you can find out when you actually play the game with the Pokemon you claim to value so much!
>But you're making an awful lot of assumptions,No, I'm evidently not.
>Well, one of those early route regional birds was actually good.Cool. Use another one that's in the game then.
>>45215455>a Pokemon being good doesn't change the fact that it's a shitmonHuh?
