>>23413605This logic may be shitty but it works. Something may be well designed but the same thing may not be appealing. There were discussions about Yo-Kai Watch beating Pokemon outside of Japan. Majority did not believe it.
But I digress. Claydol looks horrible. There is no need for so many eyes. The "paint" on it could have had better pattern too (unless I'm missing something).
Pokemon based on objects are lazy because they don't require much effort to make (or at least it seems like it). Not all of them are like that obviously but a few of them include face on the object and that's it.
>Reminder that "ugly" animals outnumber furrybait mammals by a truckload.What does it have to do with Pokemon? There are a lot of pretty animals and Pokemon should focus on them rather than on ugly ones.
>>23413661Quoting my earlier post:
>Pokemon based on animals with little to no changes are boring to me. 